The gender split of CIPD members

I'm not sure I'm in the right place to post this but I'm sure someone will be able to help.

I'd like to understand the gender split of CIPD members. I found an article in People Management from September 2017 indicating that around 21% of members are male. Does anyone know where I can find out the current figure?

https://www.peoplemanagement.co.uk/long-reads/articles/hr-gender-challenge

Alternatively, does anyone know where I can find a stat about the percentage of female HR professionals v male HR professionals. I'd like to include the stat as part of a paper I'm working on about progression into senior roles for women.

Thanks

  • Hi Joe- Johanna has pointed me to your queries, all great questions! I hope the info below helps:

    - On the gender split and data source. This is from the Annual Population Survey. The overall sample is 300k  and allows us to capture a good sample of people professionals. As others have said, the overall gender split is 60/40 but does differ a lot by type of role. The gender split in administrator roles is 91% female, 9% male for example. 

    -On the question of 'who', we’ve used the SOC (Standard Occupational Code) system to identify people professionals. It’s the classification used by the ONS generally and we use it on our Good Work Index to identify someone's occupation. We’ve included four SOC codes in the analysis, which I'll link below if you'd like to see more detail. In short, these groups are broad, so should capture much of the profession. There are some caveats of course-this doesn't include people professionals who aren't working currently or are retired, and there are some roles that may not be captured. For example, a management consultant who specialises in HR would typically wouldn't be included. 

  • Hi Keith- that's right, we've used broad occupational codes to capture people professionals. More details further down this page if you'd like to see details!
  • One of the things I have noticed about HR "seniority" is something in fact touched on in another current thread here on site. It seems that many male HR managers at a Senior level have "transferred" into HR from other Management and Senior Management roles as the "people factors" involved in operational efficiency have become more obvious to them, and/or drawn their attention and interest more. In my experience (albeit very limited in detail in this area, to my own children's and my own career choices) "HR" tends to be presented at a School careers-counselling level as almost an "also ran" semi-managerial administrative choice, rather then a true stand-alone profession with a significant part to play in business efficiency.

    (Indeed, in the same manner many businesses still see it).

    This might possibly have something to do with the imbalances at higher levels, i.e. in addition to the already well documented imbalances between male/female seniority and reward existing throughout organisations and activities on a wider scale.

    Just a thought....

    P

  • Many thanks for clarifying Melanie, much appreciated (and thanks Johanna for following this up).

    Joe