Opinion: CIPD Qualification is in massive need of modernisation

Hey all,

I am a level 7 CIPD student, with two units left before I complete my course in July. I am currently employed as a HR Director in a small business (65~ employees), prior to this I worked at very large companies as a "People Professional" in some form, albeit more of an Operations position than an HR position.

Throughout the past 2-3 years of part-time studying, I have had this growing stance on the entire qualification:

The CIPD qualification produces great HR essay writers, not great HR professionals.

Why is there absolutely zero practical work for any of the qualification? It would be so much more enriching and effective it included:

  • Roleplays for very challenging disciplinaries
  • Mini assignment to plan, manage and roleplay redundancies within an organistion end-to-end
  • Tests to create a new organisational chart for a mock company
  • Having to write mock letters responding to a tribunal claim process, to develop technical writing.
  • Create a new reward structure for a mock company
  • Develop and present a company first People Strategy/Plan

There's so much opportunity to real and practical development. Instead every unit feels the same:

  1. Be assigned unit
  2. Buy prescribed book(s)
  3. Read prescried book(s)
  4. Write a 4000 word essay

I met someone on my course who has received a merit for an essay on the topic of redundancy, but has never actual conducted a redundancy meeting of any kind in their career. This is a bit like me saying I can drive because I passed the theory test but failed the practical.

Does anyone else feel this way? Considering how much stuff I see from the CIPD promoting the use of new technology, staying modern and ahead of the curve etc. the actual qualification seems remarkably old school.

  • Unless `i've missed something Steve, did we ever get a response to this thread?
  • I do recall sharing the post with a couple of colleagues. It was an "opinion" piece.
  • I wish I seen this post earlier, a bit late to the party but agree with you 100% but more to that I am not convinced due diligence is being applied to the accreditations CIPD give to the learning providers.
    My experience last year after fleshing out 5K to do my level 7 has been absolutely horrendous across the board. No support from the learning provider to address my complaint, and nowhere to go with it upwards to the Qualification Body - CIPD. So am out of pocket and without the qualification and no resolve. However I am operating at a Director level without this qualification and doing just fine.

    That aside what you describe Charles, is not short of bang on. Doing level 5, once I had figured out "the formula" of what the learning provider wanted in each assignment it was a matter of following a process that taught me only how to understand what process was wanted to get the pass! Level 7 was worse, so prescriptive on the formula and content for each assignment and the only thing that was consistent was the inconsistency of the tutors marking and feedback. No room for experiential learning or creative writing and problem solving skills. I am not an academic and I wouldn't pay 5K to take a course to learn how to reference others work and develop a theory in writing to fit a pre ordained construct that narrow but that's what happened.

    Perhaps the issue is that one cannot teach common sense, intuition, creativity, authenticity, communicative, objective and equitable approaches etc.
    These are a few of the qualities that make a good People practitioner! Not waffle. :)!!!
  • Thank you all for the feedback, we do take it on board.

    Within the realms of assessment for the Advanced level qualifications, we try and make the scenarios as 'real life' as practical - they are designed to assess critical evaluation and analysis of both theory and practice in the workplace.

    Through the moderation process (applies to post 2021, aka 'new' qualifications) we analyse and monitor each centre's marking, and the feedback that learners receive, to ensure it meets our standards.

    Before embarking on a course of study, we'd always recommend reading the qualification specification/syllabus to get an insight into the scope of each unit, how the qualification is structured and the assessment criteria. The specifications are available here:

    https://www.cipd.org/uk/learning/qualifications/regulatory-information/

  • Maybe the level 5 wasn't the right qualification for you? Level 7 might have been better.