In reply to Ray:

Hi Ray, You are right we can be called many things - you may be interested in this poem I found some years ago and I added to it. See what you think :- You are HR
You are psychologist, psychiatrist and therapist. You are corporate machine personified. You are a closed door confidant.
You are baby announcer and obituary writer. You are Kleenex distributor. You are safe.
You are problem solver, mediator, arbitrator and lawyer. You are judge, jury and executioner. You are court reporter and record keeper.
You are timekeeper and clock watcher. You are attendance taker and holiday planner. You are sick days. You are holidays.
You are technologist and purchasing manager. You are requirements definer, tire kicker, systems tester and disaster recoverer. You are procurement and communications officer.
You are call center person and case manager. You are in-sourced, outsourced and internally sourced.
You enforce the law and are a risk mitigator. You are representative and influencer. You are policy maker and employee relations negotiator.
You are party planner, florist and caterer. You are allergist and bartender. You are cake cutter and designated driver.
You are fashion police and dress coder. You are smell detector. You are a touch preventer.
You are fire marshal and safety officer. You are ergonomic engineer and desk adjustor.
You are a doctor, a nurse and a pharmacist. You are drug tester and weight watcher. You are fundraiser, vaccinator and hand sanitizer.
You are banker and financial advisor. You are broker and estate planner. You are retirement calculator and cost estimator. You are pre-tax. You are post-tax.
You are graphic designer, author, editor and publisher. You are brand manager and enforcer. You are sign maker and hanger.
You are local and global. You are interpreter and customs officer. You are cultural attaché and welcoming committee.
You are head hunter, recruiter and assessment centre organiser. You are advertiser, interviewer, deal maker and offeror.
You are trainer, teacher and developer. You are registrar and course cataloger.
You are mother, father, sister, brother and agony aunt
You are clairvoyant, forecaster, nursemaid and medical advisor
You are diplomat, knowledgeable in all things and resilient
You are police, expert in law enforcement
You are a law and policy maker. You are a map reader and tourist guide
You are job profiler and performance monitor
You are a behaviouralist and counsellor and mental health advisor
You are a pregnant mum advisor and a flexible working expert
You are a family friendly expert
You are an event planner and caterer
You are personal dresser and fashion designer
You are a CSI and barrister
You are an expert in employee terms and conditions
You are payroll
You are letter writer, loss adjuster and health and safety inspector
You are a presenter and talent manager
You are all races, colors, religions, disabilities, sexual orientations and ages.
You are misunderstood and much maligned. You are often feared and ill-defined.
You are human. You are resourceful. You are HR.

In reply to Caroline Veronica De Silva:

Caroline, I love this! Especially being a generalist in an SME - would you mind if I shared this?!

What a great set of comments and actually very reflective of many of the issues we have been discussing internally.

'People' as a team name has actually been adopted very quickly in our organisation (albeit with some initial amusement from our Finance colleagues who did joke about becoming the 'money' team) and as a knowledge-based organisation, sits much better culturally than 'human resources' which as Steve says, doesn't actually sound that 'human' when you reflect on it. As we move to a model of employment which is increasingly flexible and personalised, thinking of individuals as 'people' rather than 'resources' is definitely an approach that seems to be making sense and working well for us. It seems to be a much better reflection of the approach and experience we want people to have when they join the organisation (for example we don't have probationary periods any more and only very minimal policies and procedures and we want people to bring their own judgement and ideas to work rather than operating just as a resource within closely defined boundaries). The challenge though is that the term 'People' just doesn't work well when you start going down to the individual job title level so its been really helpful to see your various comments and suggestions on this - thank you.

The irony in all of this, is that the term that would in fact work best to resolve all of these issues just from a naming perspective, is actually 'Personnel' - not something I thought I would be saying a few years ago when we were all busy rebranding ourselves!

In reply to Sarah:

Thanks for starting this off, Sarah... and welcome again :)