Analytics to measure Productivity

Hi Everyone

I'm wondering which units organisations use to measure productivity and therefore engagement.

At the moment, we're using absenteeism but I was keen to find something more effective to measure and therefore address changes in engagement.

Thanks

Parents
  • To pick up on Ray's point about an engagometer that works, my favourite instrument is the Gallop 12. There are so many on the market that claim to measure engagement but many are not rooted in solid research. Natasha, I agree with the previous comments that you if you measure productivity you aren't necessarily also measuring engagement. Using the Gallop 12 would give you reliable data you can use to focus on activity which will build engagement. Marcus Buckingham's book, First Break All The Rules is, IMO, essential reading for HR professionals.

    Back on galley slaves, if you are ever in Barcelona, visit the Maritime Museum. They have a life-size galley and information on the economics of operating a galley. The slaves are your engine and you need them to be working at peak efficiency, which means e.g. carrying enough water to keep them all hydrated. Also, the museum building itself is interesting. It is the medieval building where they built galleys. If you're interested in history or architecture there are plenty of medieval churches surviving and some medieval houses, but not so many examples of medieval industrial buildings.

Reply
  • To pick up on Ray's point about an engagometer that works, my favourite instrument is the Gallop 12. There are so many on the market that claim to measure engagement but many are not rooted in solid research. Natasha, I agree with the previous comments that you if you measure productivity you aren't necessarily also measuring engagement. Using the Gallop 12 would give you reliable data you can use to focus on activity which will build engagement. Marcus Buckingham's book, First Break All The Rules is, IMO, essential reading for HR professionals.

    Back on galley slaves, if you are ever in Barcelona, visit the Maritime Museum. They have a life-size galley and information on the economics of operating a galley. The slaves are your engine and you need them to be working at peak efficiency, which means e.g. carrying enough water to keep them all hydrated. Also, the museum building itself is interesting. It is the medieval building where they built galleys. If you're interested in history or architecture there are plenty of medieval churches surviving and some medieval houses, but not so many examples of medieval industrial buildings.

Children
  • About measuring productivity, just might be worth adding tthe  point that in engineering design, yes as was mentioned that design hours booked to paying client jobs is a common measure of commercial productivity but design hours booked to bids and proposals etc is ‘productivity’ just the same too. Some non productive hours such as staff absences are clear enough, but the trouble is of course that a lot of other non productive time gets booked out to current jobs by default. For example, a designer will invariably book a full day of their time to their current job whereas in reality they may only have spent a fraction of the time booked actually designing and the rest chatting to their colleagues or on Facebook or whatever.

    So time booked out to clients is often a most unreliable measure albeit that it can be the best one you’ve got.

    This becomes very apparent when there’s a shortage of work - there may well be an ‘idle time’ category to book against but if they get the chance most people won’t want to admit that they’re sitting around with nothing to do so will book this idle time to any other job they can mange to do so. Therefore  design hours on jobs during slack periods can become hugely inflated and works of fiction essentially.


    An experienced person wandering quietly through a design office ideally frequently can usually readily gauge how hard or otherwise the designers are working, but not of course empirically.

  • PS

    On the galley slaves topic, in an engineering design environment, I well recall lighthearted discussions with workplace union reps when they’d start accusing me of being harsh or callous or dictatorial towards their colleagues, when I’d say something like ‘just wait until after Christmas when the Management are going to buy me a bigger and better whip to use on you all......’

    But of course we all knew that everything was in reality far far more complicated than that fantasy...........

  • I agree David - but as we bill clients per hour, we do have to be able to justify what those hours were used for, so its hard for people to "hide" their idle time with in a project without getting called up on it! Having said that, we do get a fair amount of time booked to "internal meetings" :-)

    As you've said, its about being on the floor and talking to people, as well as managers reviewing the actual outputs - reports can only tell us so much!
  • Sure it varies massively on a spectrum, Polly, depending on how easy or difficult or feasible or whatever it is to audit bookings of time to jobs.
  • We are a consultancy company and billable work is the measure of productivity/utilisation. There is split for billable and non billable work as you've expressed here.

    However, I'm not equipped with the tools to measure engagement and this is the focus of my role for the upcoming year. Currently, our HRM has been equating engagement with productivity. We need to separate productivity and engagement and create a better strategy for enhancing engagement levels. Many of you have expressed my thoughts on this more articulately than I did in our last meeting. Any ideas on this are very welcome.
  • Hi Natasha

    I'd start by asking the question of what they [your manager/senior manager] are hoping to achieve? Is there a problem they're trying to solve (i.e. staff are not productive enough? High turnover?) or are they just trying to establish a measurement of where you are now, so that you can measure progress?

    You may already have some data from exit interviews which you could examine?

    You could as others have suggested use a survey or external provider for an assessment. Or run a focus group/employee forum with representatives or a specific group if there is a particular group where problems have been identified. It depends on your available budget and the culture of the organisation.

    There are lots of ways forward but unless you know what you're trying to measure or achieve, it could be a fairly meaningless exercise!
  • Lots of organisations out there can help you build an engagement survey......
  • Hi Natasha
    It sounds to me that this is learning more towards an employee value proposition which should include metrics on understanding how engaged your employees are feeling. This is usually done in a number of ways including engagement surveys, monitoring changes in employee behaviours including sickness/leavers etc. Happy to chat if helpful.
  • Thanks Benjamin, We decided to carry out he Great Place to Work survey again from which I have previously developed the EVP. I also wondered whether I should look at any other factors or metrics which could contribute to high levels of absenteeism in a particular division of the business.
  • We're using great place to work again for the engagement piece. What I think I'm hearing from everyone is that productivity and engagement are separate pieces and should be measured differently.