'Banked hours' vs overtime

Hi all

This is only my second time posting on the forum as I am not usually very brave. So apologies in advance if my post is too wordy.

I work in manufacturing and my company goes through peaks and troughs at certain times of the year.

Naturally, during peak periods, our factory operatives have the opportunity to work overtime and are paid at x1.5 for the first 4 hours of overtime and x2 thereafter.  

During quiet periods, we sometimes have to implement short time working or even lay off. Thankfully, the latter is very rare.

With the current cost of living situation, my senior management team are looking at ways to alleviate the financial impact of short time working on employees as well as ensure that we don’t lose good employees.

So, my MD came up with the idea of banked hours where employees would bank hours worked above their contractual hours to be used during quiet periods. For example, an employee on a 39-hour week works 48 hours in a week. Rather than pay the excess 9 hours at the relevant premiums in the pay reference period, the hours are banked. When the business is experiencing a downturn in sales and the employee is working short days (with the hours not worked unpaid), the banked hours are used to pay them for full 39 hours.

I must admit, when this was first mentioned to me, I immediately thought…TOIL (which would have been easy). However, I am a bit stumped due to the overtime element as our contract does state that overtime will be paid at the premiums and what minimum wage implications could be.

If anyone has implemented this successfully, I would be very much grateful for any ideas you can share. Likewise, any thoughts on the ‘whys’ & ‘why nots’ would be equally appreciated.

If this subject has previously been tackled, a point in the right direction would also be appreciated as I am struggling with my searches.

Many thanks in advance

Parents
  • Hi Sarah... thank you for posting!

    I hope you don't mind but I've tweaked the title of your thread.
  • Hi Steve

    Absolutely no problem at all! Thanks for the thought.
  • Also a lot of the response will be dependant upon peoples personal thoughts on inflation.

    £100 in January bought a lot more than £100 today

    Equally think carefully about how it will interact with payrises - imagine a worker banking those 10 hours Ron Munro mentioned in Jan based on the Jan pay rates, you give a 5% payrise in Apr and then they take the 10 hours instead of short working in August. Those 10 hours (which were actually only 6 worked hours) are now paid at 5% more than they were worth when banked.

    My payroll head just exploded and I suspect the accountants are shuddering at the thoughtof numerate workers banking a load of hours just pre payrise and then using post payrise at a higher rate (as surely you will have to pay up any unused bank hours at the end of the holiday / financial year)
Reply
  • Also a lot of the response will be dependant upon peoples personal thoughts on inflation.

    £100 in January bought a lot more than £100 today

    Equally think carefully about how it will interact with payrises - imagine a worker banking those 10 hours Ron Munro mentioned in Jan based on the Jan pay rates, you give a 5% payrise in Apr and then they take the 10 hours instead of short working in August. Those 10 hours (which were actually only 6 worked hours) are now paid at 5% more than they were worth when banked.

    My payroll head just exploded and I suspect the accountants are shuddering at the thoughtof numerate workers banking a load of hours just pre payrise and then using post payrise at a higher rate (as surely you will have to pay up any unused bank hours at the end of the holiday / financial year)
Children