Our organisation operate a strange pay package. I'll try to explain this in stages..
Our basic salaries are low, but employees are contractually entitled to join a "turnover bonus scheme". Typically this works out at around 35% on top of basic basic, so if an employee is contracted to £14k, they would actually expect to take home £18,900. - This is how our jobs are sold.
The "Turnover" is basically calculated on the total of hire and sale income, net of VAT with a few named exclusions. 5% of said "Turnover" is shared across employees every month. The scheme has been in place for around 10 years. Monthly payments of bonus average between 32-40%, over the year its around 35% on top of basic.
It is assumed that there will be 22 working days in each month and individual shares are reduced by absenteeism "Employees who have not taken any leave of absence through sickness, injury or unpaid holiday during the relevant period will be able to participate in the distribution of the available bonus for that relevant period."
We have furloughed staff. Under the JRS rules bonuses cannot be included in the calculation of pay. Which means our workers would, in theory, get 80% of 65% of what they would have received if in work due to their non-attendance (because the "bonus" makes up so much of our pay)
If the scheme rules suggested we could simply use an average it would be more generous for the staff. My worry is that due to the "no bonus" we may cause real financial difficulties for our people. I should add our leaders are currently holding onto the words "discretionary" in our bonus documents. I'm just looking for any thoughts on this, anyone in similar situations with attendance schemes or commissions etc?