How do you think that performance management needs to adapt to align to smart working?

The annual appraisal is more or less dead, but how can we manage the performance of people who are not necessarily in the same room as the leader?  What are companies doing to crack this?

Parents Reply Children
  • @Ruth Ann
    I would have to disagree with the notion that in the case of disciplinary or redundancy procedures that anything that happened less than a couple of months ago is "less relevant", particularly in the case of long serving staff.
    Industrial Tribunals, IMHO, would almost certainly take a longer-term view of the context in which a person is dismissed when deciding whether a dismissal was or was not a "reasonable" response to the situation.
  • I would not suggest using a performance management system to keep records of disciplinary matters. If an employee is producing poor outcomes - we suggest this information is held separately. The aim of aligning smart working to a smart performance system is to help employees produce their best work - their best outcomes. It requires the employee to observe real time feedback and take responsibility for their own performance. We have found that Smart Working requires a very different set of skills for employees, teams, leaders and HR.
  • In that case,  I've obviously misunderstood your answer to Diane's question :

    • " however, when you feed forward and have no performance ratings - how do you deal with disciplinaries and redundancies?"

    The answer being

    • "When we implement smart working we also implement real-time smart performance management. This data can be used in those situations and is actually more relevant than anything carried out months before."

  • No worries Ray. It works for us. To be fair - we don't find a lot of disciplinaries taking place when smart working is effectively deployed. Have a lovely evening.