Robots at Pyeongchang 2018 – a sign of the times or a sci-fi throwback?

Perhaps you’ve been keeping up to date with Team GB via Olympics coverage (or are cheering on other nations). Perhaps you’re not remotely interested and can’t wait till the Winter Olympics are over. Either way, there’s one team you may be interested to know have been performing very well at Pyeongchang 2018 – Team Robot.

20 robots have been taking part in the Winter Olympics, most notably in the opening ceremony and taking part in the Olympic torch relay. A robot resembling Short Circuit’s Johnny No. 5 carried a torch whilst breaking down a brick wall (presumably symbolic of barriers being broken between humanity and technology). Flying drones were also some of the privileged few chosen to bear the torch once it reached South Korea.

Robots have even been competing in their own ski tournament in Hoenseong for a $10,000 USD prize. Eight ‘skibot’ teams from universities, institutes and private companies raced down a beginner ski slope as their human counterparts in Pyeongchang waited for wind conditions to settle before being able to compete. All robots were required to be more than 50 cm tall, stand on two ‘legs’ and have joints resembling knees and elbows. Robotic vacuum cleaners have also been spotted cleaning the main press centre in Pyeonchang alongside humans using traditional vacuum cleaners.

Is robot participation an example of future technology augmenting rather than replacing humans? I asked my 7 year old what he thinks about robots performing with humans at the opening ceremony and he thought it was ‘cool.’ Colleagues at work were not as bowled over. I found it exciting to watch and then wondered what it meant for future human-robot relations. Is it celebrating South Korea’s leading role in technology? Does it remind you of the film and television robots which are no longer fiction?

South Korean officials have said that they expect robots to feature alongside all future Winter Olympics. However, in their Olympic flame-lighting ceremony press release, robots are referred to as a ‘means of transportation’ for the Olympic torch. The opening ceremony drones I watched performing alongside skiers were awe-inspiring and not a means of transport. They were fully fledged performers contributing to the ‘augmented reality’ which had been kept top secret before the ceremony.

Whether they’re cleaning buildings or flying down ski slopes, I think we’ll be seeing more of our robot colleagues at worldwide events in the future.

Parents
  • I think that, increasingly, physical robots are something of a false flag in stories about threats to jobs. Physical robots are primarily used under human supervision to perform tasks that humans either can't or won't do: entering risky or compressed areas (like vacuuming under the sofa!), for example.

    Far more interesting - and threatening - are the non-physical robots.

    Rather than gears and pistons, their machinery is comprised of algorithms in increasingly dense and complex relationships that are able to turn data into decisions - not flawlessly, but then no human decision-making tree has ever been flawless, either. These ghostbots aren't artificial intelligence, because they aren't designed to resemble intelligent behaviour. They are machines as much as their physical counterparts, but their outputs, rather than movement or illumination, are decisions.

    They are the robots that decide what adverts will appear in your social media stream. They are the robots that decide what your insurance premiums will be. They are the robots that pick the right song to play you, and the right variety of wine to order. They are the robots that decide what news you see, what voices you hear and what jobs you are offered. They are the robots that will eventually identify who will be made redundant and why. They are beginning to help police to sift through digital evidence: deciding what is and what is not relevant from mountains of data.

    I don't oppose either kind of robot in principle. I can think of a thousand ways that Alexa and her ilk can help make my life a little more easeful. But I would caution people not to be distracted by Johnny 5 and Roomba when the robots they should really worry about are the ones they can't see.
  • I for one welcome our robot overlords, and I hope in the future they recall this message before deciding whether or not to send me to one of their human work camps.
Reply Children