Opinion: CIPD Qualification is in massive need of modernisation

Hey all,

I am a level 7 CIPD student, with two units left before I complete my course in July. I am currently employed as a HR Director in a small business (65~ employees), prior to this I worked at very large companies as a "People Professional" in some form, albeit more of an Operations position than an HR position.

Throughout the past 2-3 years of part-time studying, I have had this growing stance on the entire qualification:

The CIPD qualification produces great HR essay writers, not great HR professionals.

Why is there absolutely zero practical work for any of the qualification? It would be so much more enriching and effective it included:

  • Roleplays for very challenging disciplinaries
  • Mini assignment to plan, manage and roleplay redundancies within an organistion end-to-end
  • Tests to create a new organisational chart for a mock company
  • Having to write mock letters responding to a tribunal claim process, to develop technical writing.
  • Create a new reward structure for a mock company
  • Develop and present a company first People Strategy/Plan

There's so much opportunity to real and practical development. Instead every unit feels the same:

  1. Be assigned unit
  2. Buy prescribed book(s)
  3. Read prescried book(s)
  4. Write a 4000 word essay

I met someone on my course who has received a merit for an essay on the topic of redundancy, but has never actual conducted a redundancy meeting of any kind in their career. This is a bit like me saying I can drive because I passed the theory test but failed the practical.

Does anyone else feel this way? Considering how much stuff I see from the CIPD promoting the use of new technology, staying modern and ahead of the curve etc. the actual qualification seems remarkably old school.

Parents
  • OK, mulling a bit further on this - when I did my law qualification, it was the conversion route - so I spent 2 years, part time, learning the theory and knowledge that underpins most of our legal system, and wrote essays and exam answers to prove that I had memorised lots of legal cases (useful to precisely no lawyer ever I'm guessing, because: the internet). However to become a practising solicitor or barrister you had to do a further course that demonstrated you had the ability to turn that knowledge into practical work - to study for the bar, or to do the legal practice course.

    I wonder whether it would be overcomplicating things to do a similar process in the HR field? To learn the theory and underpinning law/knowledge that informs everything that we do, and then to do a separate course in applying it in difficult or real world situations?

    Just a thought.
Reply
  • OK, mulling a bit further on this - when I did my law qualification, it was the conversion route - so I spent 2 years, part time, learning the theory and knowledge that underpins most of our legal system, and wrote essays and exam answers to prove that I had memorised lots of legal cases (useful to precisely no lawyer ever I'm guessing, because: the internet). However to become a practising solicitor or barrister you had to do a further course that demonstrated you had the ability to turn that knowledge into practical work - to study for the bar, or to do the legal practice course.

    I wonder whether it would be overcomplicating things to do a similar process in the HR field? To learn the theory and underpinning law/knowledge that informs everything that we do, and then to do a separate course in applying it in difficult or real world situations?

    Just a thought.
Children
No Data