In reply to Steven :
thank you Steven. Although I do this given that we have an informal setting but the term (MBWA) is new to me.This is a very typical dilemma for an HR leader "in one person". Many find a balance thanks to clear prioritization: they allocate separate time for operational tasks and separately for strategic planning, so that one does not eat the other. Simple tools for task tracking, regular check-ins with management and a conscious focus on your own well-being help, because without it it is easy to burn out. By the way, well-designed employee benefits can support not only the team, but also the HR manager himself: betterme.world/.../.
In reply to Hannah:
The Excellent Organisation, by Tom Peters.Hello Hannah,
I’m in a very similar one-person HR role, covering both operational and strategic work, and it can definitely impact productivity.
What helped for me was delegating some HR-assistant-type admin tasks to existing roles, based on grade/capability, interest in an HR pathway, and the confidentiality level of the work. For example, I allocated general HR administration to the front desk/admin role (especially where there was an interest in HR), and more confidential operational support to the Executive PA.
This did require some role-alignment so the tasks were formally captured in role expectations and appraisal documentation. The benefit is continuity, operational HR can still run if you take a week’s leave, rather than everything sitting with you.So this can work until the company allows room for more FTE numbers and you prepare a business case since you will have seen the need especially considering the addition of the other staff numbers because that means more work.
Visit the main CIPD website
Empowering people
A place to learn, debate, and connect
© Copyright Chartered Insitute of Personnel and Development 2025, 151 The Broadway, London SW19 1JQ, UK Incorporated by Royal Charter, Registered Charity No. 1079797