HR Officer vs HR Coordinator

Hi Agnes

I don’t think there is any meaningful difference between these two job titles.

All they convey to me is that they’re probably middle management level roles specialising in HR: the particular responsibilities and duties will I’m sure vary immensely between particular organisations. ‘Co ordinator’ is a somewhat ambiguous term I think but to me implies someonetasked with pointing the way, so almost the same as ‘adviser’. Although maybe co ordinator too implies that they’re generalists, but not necessarily.

The 20th century poet TS Eliot might have been describing HR job titles when he wrote ‘filled with fancies and empty of meaning’ - but of course wasn’t really ;-)

I believe that HR Coordinator is a level up from HR Assistant. After that comes HR Officer which I believe is equal to HR Advisor. Different companies choose different titles. I hope this helps.

My 2p worth is that a HR Co-Ordinator could be either a HR Administrator or a HR Adviser. Unlikely to be much above that. Coordination to me suggests more passive administration work so if anything it is a posh way of describing a lower role.

HR Manager is a rather unused term now. Most HR Managers called themselves BPs even if their roles haven't changed much. So for me a HRM is like a junior HRBP doing some but not all of the role.

Thank you all for your replies. It's much clearer now.

I think it also depends on the business, I'm a HR Manager but in a small start up and so makes sense to me to be titled Manager rather than BP. I think it would be beyond most colleagues what a BP means in my company haha!

Its beyond most people in big businesses what a HR BP is but that hasn't stopped people using it.

Hi Agnes , In my experience a hr coordinator is the level below a hr administrator. The coordinator literally co-ordinates mostly interviews and sometimes training and other ad hoc requests. It's generally used in companies that tend to have high recruitment needs and frees up time for the recruiter/manager. Also they generally do not need to be qualified or have a background in HR. After coordinator the next step is administrator followed by generalist and then officer/adviser.

In my experience (and unfortunately I have had lots lately job hunting) it depends on the organisation. In larger companies I have found the HR Coordinator role used for that at slightly higher level than or instead of HR Administrator. I dont hear HR Officer used very often at all except in the Public Sector where that is higher than both and and Administrator and a Coordinator. Also on the rare occasion it does appear in the private sector it is usually mid level role.
Looking at your responses it seems that there could be a number of variables as to what organisations give certain roles certain titles - I have personally witnessed a role being called Officer but spent the interview listening to the person conducting the interviewing vary between calling said post Officer or Advisor and most recently one role that had originally been called Generalist was changed to Coordinator at the 11th hour because they had added slightly different elements to in that the previous incumbent had done below.

Honestly? I think it depends on the company, the size of their HR Department and whether or not they truly understand the broad spectrum of functions within HR.

Like others have said it varies depending on the organisation/business. To me though HR Officer seems a bit old hat? I think its just my interpretation of the 'officer' bit... policing the policies etc!

It will also depend on a company's business context and requirements as they will determine what kind of structure and role HR will have. But all in all, I think there is little difference between the two. Operationally both are on the same level for me. After all what's in a job title..the day to day responsibilities define a role better :-)