Improving Working Lives - except for older workers?

The Centre for Better Ageing has just released a report calling on UK employers to make their policies and practices more age-friendly as thousands of employers are unprepared for the ageing workforce (https://www.ageing-better.org.uk/news/uk-employers-unprepared-ageing-workforce?platform=hootsuite)

They say: "Without changes to our workplaces, more and more of us will face worse working lives as we age."

Is your organisation prepared for the demographic shift? What actions are you taking to be "age-friendly"?

  • More organisations are starting to think and talk about age diversity in general and how to effectively support multi-generational workforces.

    The CIPD conducted some research on this a few years ago which might be of interest, looking at both employee and employer perspectives and some of the things that organisations need to know.

    The overall aim of the research was to look at creating strategies that help organisations to be inclusive and retain and develop age diverse workforces.

  • I have to admit that i haven't read the whole report (it is outstandingly and necessarily long), but have dipped into bits of it and as an 'older worker' I really don't see how they have come to the conclusion they have. A lot of the 'evidence' is subjective opinion - for example there are references to people being told that "they wouldn't be able to find any roles for them" as they were 62, however it is clear that this is referring to a recruitment agency and we all know that whilst there are some very good agencies out there, there are also some terrible ones, so it is not representative of employers as a whole.

    They also make major assumption for example in relation to the bit about older workers being less likely to be given training. The implication is that it is because employers are discriminating, however it could be personal choice - my employer is willing to fund me to do the 1 year Masters Top up for my CIPD, but as I'm less than 10 years from retirement, i really can't see what the benefit would be to either me or the organisation. It would have been much more beneficial to me 10 - 15 years ago (i didn't work here then)

    The vast majority of my friends are older than me and range between 52 and 74. None of them have every experienced any difficulties getting the type of work they wanted (i do acknowledge that may not be the case for everyone) and in general, they are like me - looking forward to retiring and seeing the world a bit.

    So i am really in the camp that feels that more flexibility in work to enable people to deal with circumstances in their life regardless of age, gender or anything else is key really and there isn't a need for initiatives to support older workers specifically.
  • "The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'" as the old saying goes.
  • www.peoplemanagement.co.uk/.../age-discrimination-rife-says-government-agency

    The attached is an article from people management dated 17 July 2018 in which they state that “Age discrimination remains rife in the workplace, and particularly in the recruitment market, according to an excoriating report from an influential government committee.”.

    There was also debate about this on several forms of media around the time this was released.

    In short it is an issue the government is aware of but has failed to address to date. “Meanwhile, bias – and potentially illegal discrimination – was a “significant problem” in the recruitment process, the committee found”

    It is an issue where there is acknowledged discrimination against 31% of the (potentially) working population just because they happen to be over the age of 50.

    It is a scandal that is just beginning to come to the forefront, not because it is manifestly wrong and unfair but because of a predicted shortage of workers.

    Your friends are extremely fortunate if they have not experienced this issue.
  • I have to admit that i have zero confidence in articles produced by People Management which for the past year or so has published Daily Mail'esque headlines, which bear no resemblance to any actual data or information referenced in the article. Quite frequently, they post Facebook posts blaming HR for the worlds ills and I am currently trying to see if i can stop it coming through my letter box.

    The PM article is simply referring the same report that Anna initially posted about and adds no further evidence that this is an issue. They state that there is a significant problem in the recruitment process, but including nothing other than anecdotal evidence to support that very strong claim.

    I have been working for more than 34 years and am in my 50's. 22 years of my working life have been spent in HR in a wide range of organisations and sectors. I genuinely have never come across age discrimination and also no of no-one who has. I am not saying that it doesn't happen, however, i never wanted to be highlighted as in need of support and assistance simply because i am a woman and i really really don't see that I need any additional support or changes simply because i am now classed as 'older'. There may be times that i do need support or adjustments to my work but, they will be due to my specific individual circumstances at the time and they could occur regardless of my age or gender.
  • Hmm ... changes to the workplace for older workers! I suppose they mean dedicated parking spaces for our zimmer frames; adjustments to the office wear policy so that we can wear our tartan velcro slippers all day; corporate rates with the hairdresser so that we can have a blue rinse and shampoo and set at cheap rates; provision of day beds for our nap after Bargain Hunt; fresh tea at regular intervals made in a pot and served in a cup and saucer; ensure that everybody talks to us very loud, slowly, right in our faces and with their heads inclined; etc. That sort of thing perhaps? I'm 64 and happily managing to carry on working, full-time. If I needed any adjustments (which I don't), I'm quite adult enough to ask for myself. My mind is still active, my speech unaffected by age, amazingly my dark brown hair has only 2 grey ones so far, I can dress myself and usually manage to eat lunch without dribbling too much. I go out dancing whenever I can (ska, reggae or hard-house). As the government keeps moving the pension age goalposts further away from me, I have no alternative but to keep working financially. But actually I'm going to carry on anyway because I enjoy working.
  • I realise you're making your comments tongue in cheek Judy but I suspect there are recruiters and managers in the workplace who genuinely hold these stereotypes of older workers.
  • I know there are. I got asked a couple of weeks ago if I thought I could manage a full time job 5 days a week.

    This was while the recruiter was lookIng down at my date of birth on the birth certificate they had demanded I bring along as a part of their checks. While I am well aware that employers need to verify the right to work in the UK, it is also a jolly good way of finding out the exact age of the applicant at the interview.

    As I said in a previous post on another thread, I could write a book about the poor practice I have witnessed first hand. My experience is reflected in the unemployment and economic inactivity statistics.