• Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 7 subscribers
  • Views 202 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

The new issue of People Management magazine is out now!

ElliefromPM

Loudspeaker The August-October 2026 issue of People Management is out now! In this issue, you can learn...

Stopwatch how to best measure employee performance, and why it's not as simple as 'one size fits all'

Pound what it's like doing HR in the private equity field – and why the sector is increasingly learning the value of good people practices

Joystick how some organisations are using tools like gamification, CV-less hiring and 'extreme' interviews to find talent in the age of AI-generated applications

Bangbang what you need to be aware of ahead of changes to third-party harassment laws in October

Printed copies are winging their way to members' letterboxes as I type this, or if you can't wait that long, you can read the digital version right now on the People Management website (members will need to be logged in).

What's your favourite article from this issue? Reply below and tell us Arrow heading down

Parents

  • I elected to stop receiving People Management a few years ago due to it's very 'anti HR' approach, with many articles, and social media posts blaming HR for all manner of things.  I provided feedback at the time and given this post thought I would check to see if it had changed to be a tad more supportive to the profession it represents.

    I didn't have to go too far to find  this article " The middle management burnout crisis: is HR to blame?" 

    So I think I'll continue to give it a miss.

  • in reply to Teresa

    Teresa, I still take the magazine as I think it's useful to see where the editorial focus lies and what it chooses to zero in on. I take your point, I'd say the headlines often follow a journalistic/ news/ clickbait approach which is everywhere and inescapable it seems. I usually find one or two useful articles each edition and it reminds me that for those new to the profession or in more generic, less specialist roles the magazine serves a purpose. It's not my go to read anymore, I find Work is so much better and a true perk of being and keeping fellowship status. It's more heavyweight, broader and goes deeper. 

Reply
  • in reply to Teresa

    Teresa, I still take the magazine as I think it's useful to see where the editorial focus lies and what it chooses to zero in on. I take your point, I'd say the headlines often follow a journalistic/ news/ clickbait approach which is everywhere and inescapable it seems. I usually find one or two useful articles each edition and it reminds me that for those new to the profession or in more generic, less specialist roles the magazine serves a purpose. It's not my go to read anymore, I find Work is so much better and a true perk of being and keeping fellowship status. It's more heavyweight, broader and goes deeper. 

Children
No Data